The 4 Worst Selling Starbucks Drinks Ever

We're always hearing about the latest and greatest Starbucks creation, but what about those creations that didn't do so well. These are the four that sucked the most.

Starbucks is absolutely my boat. You know what boat means, right? It's like "my jam" only better, and you should totally use it.

My boat, Starbucks, has a lot of delicious drinks, with my favorite being a skinny peppermint mocha. Seeing that the skinny peppermint mocha has been on the menu for quite a while, it seems like that's not only my favorite but a lot of other people's favorites too.

Starbucks does come out with some duds though, especially these four.

According to Delish, these are the four worst selling drinks in Starbucks history.

1. Chantico: Starbucks' drinkable dessert. This was a drinking chocolate—basically melted chocolate in a cup—that was based on a popular European after-dinner treat. People in America, however, were not impressed. 
2. Mazagran: where soda meets coffee. In 1995, PepsiCo and Starbucks got together to create this completely bizarre bottled beverage—part coffee, part cola. The drink bombed, but '95 wasn't a complete failure: Frappuccinos became insanely popular that same year.
3. Sorbetto: slushies with a twist. This fruity, icy beverage—which came in two flavors (tangy and citrus ice) were built to be a foil for Frappuccinos. According to Fool, the drinks required a special machine, which stores beyond the West Coast never got. Probably a good thing. 
4. Vivanno: smoothies for the healthy set. Launched in 2008, these line of blended drinks were crammed with all kinds of good stuff (a whole banana) and none of the bad (no artificial flavors or colors). But the company realized that folks stop in for a serious caffeine boost, not a meal-replacement.